So now Superbowl XLIV is in the books. The New Orleans Saints shocked the world and won a game they were supposed to be happy to even find themselves in. Bourbon Street is ecstatic and so is just about every Peyton Manning hater out there.
The hot topic in the sports media today is "Did Peyton Manning forever tarnish his legacy by throwing a pick six and blowing the Superbowl?"
I am thoroughly convinced that, no, "The Pick Six" isn't what blew the Superbowl.
However, Peyton Manning, the only quarterback in the NFL to call his own plays, did.
That's not to take credit away from the Saints. Drew Brees put on a passing clinic, the Saints' team hustled, and their coaches, frankly, "outcoached" the Colts'.
First, let's look at what the Saints did right, starting with their gameplan.
The Saints were pretty conservative and ball control oriented in the first half. This had a lot of people scratching their heads early on, as they expected to see the Saints spreading the Colts out to throw.
However, as Chris Brown over on Smart Football explained wonderfully, the Saints offense is extremely multiple in its formations as well as their plays. They did a fantastic job of putting the Colts defense in conflict with their various formations and matchups, giving Drew Brees some open receivers to throw to as well as the time to get the ball out to them. This game should be shown to all NFL offensive coordinators for years as part of a clinic presentation on "NFL Offense 101."
The conservative strategy really seemed to control the pace of the game early on for the Saints, calming the offense down and letting it feel things out and get into a groove without risking turnovers. It also kept them from getting into a shootout and losing their minds when they were down 10-0 early, too.
In short, they let the game come to them on their terms. All of this really started making a difference in the second quarter, where the Saints limited the Colts to just 6 offensive snaps and took command of the game despite still trailing at halftime 10-6.
Sean Payton's management of the game was brilliant. While the onside kick to open the second half has gotten most of the media attention, I believe Payton's best call was really the unsuccessful 4th down attempt near at the Colts goal line in the closing minutes of the half.
Payton smartly believed that even if the Saints were unsuccessful, they had pinned the Colts inside the 5 yard line, that the Colts would be trying for the quick score themselves and that with timeouts remaining the Saints had a chance to still get a field goal before the half if they could just force a quick 3 and out.
All of that stuff came to pass. Payton found a way for the Saints to both have their cake (trying for a TD on 4th down) and eat it too (still get points out of this situation even if the attempt was unsuccessful).
The onside kick was also a brilliant job of scouting and coaching. In postgame interviews, the players said that the Saints' coaching staff had noticed on film that the Colts' Hank Baskett had a habit of bailing too soon on kickoffs, so they went right after him. Payton announced the onside kick to his players at the beginning of halftime after they'd practiced it all week. This is an excellent job of paying attention to details and exploiting them through planning and preparation.
Further, the Saints' Defensive Coordinator Greg Williams had three seperate ready-made gameplans for Manning in this game: a first half plan (mostly conservative zone defense), a third quarter plan (a little tougher package of zone pressure and blitzes that overloaded a side of the Colts' pass protection), and then an additional fourth quarter plan to really blitz and get after Manning with man coverage behind it.
Still, the Saints could not have came back from a 10-0 deficit if it hadn't been for the Colts' mistakes, mistakes that go far beyond "Pick Six" in the fourth quarter. Caldwell's team had failed to notice or address Baskett's problems on kickoff returns when he could be observed on film commiting a cardinal sin there, a mistake that would have gotten him benched on many high school teams.
For anyone who thinks that special teams play is overrated, the huge swing in momentum AND the denial of an entire position to the Colts offense should really demonstrate how important they truly are.
You could tell that the Saints' ball control was getting to Manning in the 2nd quarter. The cameras kept cutting to shots of Manning looking angry and frustrated as he sat on the bench alone, helpless and unable to get back out or stay on the field.
From his expression, you'd think his team was losing by 40, not leading by 7. He would maintain that expression throughout the game as the Colts first lost the lead, then regained it, then lost it and kissed any chance of a win goodbye with "The Pick Six" and a stalled two minute drill.
I believe this really impacted the Colts' in the second half. Manning, the Colts' playcaller, basically abandoned the run in the second half in favor of trying to force passes between defenders. He had some beauties, like the "how-did-he-do-that?" throw to Dallas Clark on the third quarter touchdown drive, but Manning only let the Colts run the ball a total of 8 times for 27 yards in the second half, despite his team protecting a lead for most of that span.
It's also worth noting that 24 of those yards, and 4 of those attempts, came on the Colts first drive of the second half, which went for a touchdown. Manning's crushing Pick Six came after 8 straight pass attempts and 14 passes over the Colts' previous 17 offensive plays. Of the Colts 37 plays in the second half, the Colts passed on over 81% despite having a great deal of success running the ball in the first half.
That is predictability, and numerous statistical analysis have shown that running the ball is the safest way to protect a lead: teams who pass the ball when nursing a lead tend to lose far more often than those who commit to running it. Since Manning fiercely insists on maintaining his autonomy to call plays at the line, it was not Jim Caldwell's decisions that caused this, though he is getting roasted by commentators and fans ignorant of this fact.
It's especially disappointing since Joseph Addai had such a great first half and was giving the Saints fits on draws and traps. On only 7 carries, Addai had shredded the Saints defense in the first half for 60 yards and appeared to be the MVP in the making at halftime (many still believe he should've been MVP of the last Colts Superbowl win). In the second half, however, Manning tried to take over the game himself and took the ball out of Addai's hands. A 17-16 lead turned into a 31-17 loss.
Addai only had 17 yards on 6 carries in the second half, with 3 of those coming for 19 yards on the Colts final touchdown drive in the 3rd quarter. He had only 3 carries for -2 yards in the fourth quarter, both pre-and-post Pick Six. The result: the Colts went from nursing a 17-16 lead to sputtering offensively, Manning threw a pick six to put the game away, and then any hope of a comeback died in a failed two minute drill where Addai carried the ball only once for -2 yards near the goalline.
We can make all sorts of speculation on WHY Manning chose to abandon the running game for the Colts when protecting a lead in the second half of a big game, just as he's done countless times before in his career going back to his college days. Such blovating and unfounded B.S. would be unfair to Manning, one of the game's hardest workers and most intense competitors. However, the numbers do hint that Manning's decisions when calling the plays may have cost himself and the Colts a second Superbowl ring.
Coaches will tell you that playcalling is overrated and I'll agree, but this was a textbook example of how it can and does matter.
Yes, Virginia, the Colts CAN lay a heaping portion of the blame for this loss on Peyton Manning. However, they must credit him for guiding the team this far. If not for Manning, the Colts are basically Dwight Freeney, Dallas Clark, Reggie Wayne, and a bunch of guys no one would have ever heard of.
Let's not forget that he is still the league's best passer and that his resume includes many of the best seasons of all-time, at least statistically, ever recorded by a quarterback. One play did not cost this game anymore than it cost Peyton Manning a certain first ballot Hall of Fame induction, and it's possible that he'll be back in a future Superbowl before it's all said and done.
For the Colts' sake, let's hope he remembers it's still legal to run the ball next time.
OK, I try to focus more on the coaching and fundamental aspects of football in this blog rather than getting caught up in the fan and media circus side of things. However, sometimes something comes along that's just too weird NOT to write about.
The reactions I've seen from from others online have ranged from "What a great story!" to "What a load of crap!" I'm more inclined to agree with the latter.
In fact, given Kiffin's track record I'm more inclined to pray for this kid and his future, as this could be one of the worst things that could possibly happen to a young QB at that age. By the time that this kid is actually old enough to sign that offer a myriad of things could go wrong.
First of all, that story reads like a press release for Steve Clarkson, private QB tutor and "Dream Maker." Calling Jimmy Clausen (a Clarkson pupil) the "Lebron of football" and then claiming that Kiffin took this seriously was a flood of B.S. of biblical proportions. Kiffin apparently watched a few clips on the kid, David Sills, then called his parents immediately and "offered him a scholarship" (an offer that's not guaranteed until the kid signs the paperwork, which he can't even legally do for another 4 years).
Clips similar to these, perhaps? Sills wears #1 in in the (self)promotional video below.
Dad, of course, is very excited. So is David Sills. You really can't blame the boy. Any coach who has to deal with this kid over the next five years must already be grumbling.
At 13, Sills is really in a position to screw up his entire life. It's also going to be hard for his HS coaches to say anything to him when "Steve Clarkson and Lane Kiffin told me to ________ so I'll be better prepared for the next level." The first time they bench him or ask him to do something that he doesn't agree with, his father (who is presumably pretty wealthy to be able to afford Clarkson's services) will surely be jumping down the coach's throats.
Additionally, tons of kids look like studs in middle school but don't pan out at the varsity level--any youth, middle school, or high school coach worth his salt knows this. Authorities on QBs such as Darin Slack have commented on how many young QBs will actually regress as players between middle school and their Senior year of high school. He's already hyped so much because of this story that there's no way he could ever deliver unless he goes undefeated in HS as a 4 year starter and breaks all the records on the books. Any chance that David Sills ever had of a normal adolescence was just destroyed. Every adult in thie story (parents, Clarkson, and Kiffin) comes across as treating this boy as a meal ticket but that offer is not guaranteed. Kiffin might not be there in five years (and probably won't, given his history--he'll leave for any team who gives him a bigger paycheck and more exposure), but even if he is at USC, Kiffin's already got a track record of pulling scholarship offers from commitments at Tennessee and has been accused of all sorts of dishonest or cowardly things by his players and coworkers there.
Sills can make it through school riding high because he thinks he's got a free ride to USC lined up, then watch that offer evaporate if he doesn't continue to get better (or physically more mature--at 6'0" he's the same height I was at his age, but I only grew to 6'1", which is "too short" for Kiffin).
What if USC just feels they've found better QBs elsewhere? One of the first things that Kiffin did when he took over at Tennessee was to tell three highly rated QB commitments that they weren't "his guy" because he felt he could do better. He did the same with many players already on the Tennessee roster, such as Chattanooga product (and QB) B.J. Coleman, causing a mass exodus.
Many coaches and observers out there have been incredulous. They have presumed that Kiffin's "offer" was never meant to be taken seriously and has been blown out of proportion by this AP story. The thing is, Kiffin has already established a track record here, too...
Some choice quotes in that article from Kiffin really lead me to believe that this is just part of his new recruiting strategy.
Of the Berry recruitment, Staples wrote:
Kiffin's only previous foray into tween recruiting seems fairly prescient. Last month, Kiffin said he had offered a scholarship to only one player younger than 10th grade. "Matt Barkley," Kiffin said. "That year I had Orange County, and Barkley was a freshman." In 2005, Kiffin was USC's offensive coordinator and recruiting coordinator. He visited Mater Dei High in Santa Ana, Calif. -- Matt Leinart's alma mater -- and saw Barkley throwing. Kiffin's instincts were dead on. Barkley wound up being the top-rated quarterback prospect in the 2009 class, and as a true freshman this season still may push Aaron Corp for the Trojans' starting job.
Expect Kiffin and his coaches to pay attention to players as young as Evan Berry even more in the future. "When you really have a recruiting machine going," Kiffin said last month, "you're in on the ninth and 10th graders because you know your areas so well."
Despite this, Kiffin himself even backs away from committing to the kid in the next paragraph...
"It's not like basketball where guys are playing. ... We don't get to see them very often," Kiffin said. "And the growth is so much different. A ninth-grader in football grows so much and adds so much weight that it's pretty hard to project."
If anyone had any doubt or had somehow forgot how Kiffin left Tennesseee, it should be remembered that this is a guy to whom loyalty is only a 1 way street. Honestly, there's not much downside for Kiffin. If the kid pans out, he's built the relationship up early and has the inside track on a hot prospect. If the kid doesn't go on to become the next elite QB recruit, Kiffin can just cast him aside without a second thought since no paperwork has actually been signed.
So yes, Lane Kiffin is a creep who is now playing upon the dreams of middle school kids for his own ends. It's only a matter of time before he starts telling Pee Wee dads their 6 year old is going to be the next great USC Tailback.Kiffin, of course, is prohibited by the NCAA from actually commenting on unsigned recruits, something he was reprimanded for while coaching at Tennessee.
I very much hope that David Sills does not turn out to be the second coming of Todd Marinovich. I think even Todd Marinovich hated being Todd Marinovich. However, at this point he certainly appears to be headed down that path.
There are a lot of coaching websites out there. In football, you have sites up for just about every age group and for every type of offense and defense imaginable.
For my money, the best one I've found by far is good ol' Coach Huey, which was thankfully one of the first sites I found when I made the decision to become a coach. Imagine a free online coaching clinic that lasts 24 hrs a day, 365 days a year. I strongly recommend that all coaches become a member and start participating.
Besides featuring posts from experienced football coaches from around the world who have experience at every level, from Pee Wee to the NFL, this moderated (thank goodness!) site has a sub forum for just about everything as well as a great articles section. It's a great site for anyone looking to learn about and discuss the game from a coach's perspective, and it's one of the best networking resources available in the field.
Even though they make up 45% of the offensive players on the field at any given time, and even though any coach with half a brain will tell you that "games are won and lost up front," I've noticed that many fans and coaches who weren't former offensive linemen are often confused when they hear the terms "man blocking" and "zone blocking" scheme thrown around. They wonder "what do these terms even mean?"
The confusion has gotten so bad that I've seen fans get upset when they read online that their team has hired a particular offensive coordinator or offensive line coach who stresses "zone blocking" because they think it's some newfangled thing he pulled out of his butt at his last stop and that the zone is why their offensive line sucked.
Well... no. Man blocking schemes are old school, going back to the prehistoric origins of football, even back before the days of Pop Warner and the Single Wing. However, Zone blocking isn't all that new either. It's been a staple of every NFL running game since the mid 90s, and has been the choice of just about every dominant NFL rushing team since at least the mid 80s. Now it's become the foundation of ALL NFL teams' running games. In the NFL, zone blocking is the way to go because their pro offensive linemen are athletic enough to pull it off and because it gives them more time to work on protecting their $100 million QBs.
So why do so many people still have no clue what it is?
I blame announcers and a tendency to try and oversimplify things. When many coaches to try explain the difference, they'll say "Man blocking means the offensive lineman has to block a person, while Zone blocking means he blocks an 'area.'" From that definition it sounds like they'd always have the playside tackle always blocking down on a 1 tech DT in a man scheme or they tell him to block some very specific patch of grass which may have no one on it...
So, let's examine these concepts, shall we?
First off, making the debate "Zone vs. Man" a bit misleading. There's also "Gap" Blocking, which splits the difference, when these terms are applied to the running game. Man vs. Zone in pass protection is a little different.
"Man blocking" does mean that the offensive lineman is assigned a particular defensive player to block-- the specific blocking assignment is built into the play. But it's not always as specific s "block the NG" because there might not even be a NG.
Man blocking systems basically require a different set of blocking rules for each play. Because defensive fronts vary so much, a lot of Man blocking teams will use a numbering system with their blocking rules. The 1st man on the playside (i.e., the side of the field the ball is being run to--the center and anyone lined up over him is always the first man on "the playside") is labeled "0." The second will be "1." Third is "2." Etc. The blocking calls may depend a great deal on the Center identifying the front as belonging to a particular "family" and calling it out to the rest of the OL, who then picks their man and goes to work. As you may have figured out, all of this can get complicated and confusing, so Man blocking rules aren't very popular in the running game these days.
Zone blocking assigns the offensive lineman an "area," as people say, and gives them general rules for blocking it. If you look at zone blocking, what it really does is take old school Man blocking schemes and boils them down to the underlying principles that make them work against different fronts, then teaches the principles to the offensive linemen so they can (theoretically) figure out their own answers to whatever a defense throws at them on the field.
There are basically only two types of zone run blocking: Inside Zone (IZ) and Outside Zone (OZ). On IZ, the offensive line looks to open a hole off the playside guard, while in OZ the aiming point is off the playside tackle/TE. OZ zone blocking can be as simple as "everyone reach block the playside gap." If the rules dictate that two offensive linemen block the same defensive lineman, you'll get natural "combo" blocks where one player base blocks the defensive lineman, while the other helps him for a couple of steps and then slips off to block a pursuing LB.
Zone blocking seeks to establish "a massive wall of blockers moving to the playside." It's often further augmented by cut blocks on the backside and by giving the ball carrier a "read" to make. The ball carrier will key a particular defender (such as the NG) or maybe a particular blocker (such as the OT's butt). Depending upon where the NG winds up going, the ball carrier will attack the furthest playside gap or run through a predicted cutback lane. To make the most of this, it requires a runner with great vision and good agility. Terrell Davis and Emmett Smith both made their livings off the zone cutbacks during their careers, like the one Davis makes when he cuts off the Tackle's block on an Outside Zone play in the example below:
Nowadays shotgun spread teams will further augment their zone running games by having the QB read an unblocked defender on the backside of the zone and keep the ball around that edge if a better hole opens up there. That's the Zone Read, in a nutshell.
Many zone blocking teams make it a point of emphasis that they only have a handful of blocking schemes in their playbook, total, though they may run 4 or 5 different plays off each. Their reason for doing this is to keep it as simple as possible for the offensive line because one missed block can destroy a play and defenses will incorporate all sorts of shifting and stemming into different fronts to try to make that happen.
However, while Zone blocking may sound like the obvious best choice, there are some caveats to using it. First off, your linemen still have to know what they're doing. A confused offensive lineman, even in a simple scheme, is still an ineffective offensive lineman.
Second, many coaches will tell you that a Zone blocking offensive lineman must have some athletic ability, as zone footwork can involve intricate "bucket steps" and blocking very athletic defensive players on the move.
Third, because of the use of things like bucket steps (where the offensive lineman will quickly take a couple of steps back or horizontally to get his body in better position before he really gets into his block), many coaches feel that zone blocking rules must be adjusted or replaced in short yardage situations, otherwise their linemen will get blown up at the line.
So that's it, right? You man it or you zone it and you run the ball. Great!
Ah, but as Lee Corso would say: "Not so fast, my friend!"
As I said earlier, there is a third option, Gap blocking and it splits the difference. Gap blocking is what you'll see a lot from Wing-T teams and other offenses that like to pull and trap with their linemen. A gap blocking scheme is basically what it sounds like: a player will block the defender in the specific gap on either side of him.
The simplest explanation of this would be the blocking on Power, where you want the DE to be kicked out. In the blocking on that play, every offensive lineman on the playside will block down (block the defensive lineman or linebacker in the playside gap inside of him). The backside guard will pull and either kick out the DE or lead through the hole, while the backside OT will cut block any defender in the backside B gap. It's a simple scheme, but you don't get many opportunities for double teams unless you want to tweak it by calling one (like having the playside G and T combo any DT in the B gap).
Feel the Power!
While gap blocking schemes are simple, they still require that the offensive linemen memorize and apply a particular set of blocking rules for each play. Gap blocking schemes also require that the runners follow an assigned track and wait for the hole to open up. If the hole doesn't open as it's supposed to, the plays usually aren't very successful.
So that's the running game. Now for "Man" vs. "Zone" in the passing game.
This is a little simpler. Basically, a "Man" pass protection scheme is the classic "Big on Big" (BOB) blocking. The offensive linemen will block the defensive linemen across from them, an uncovered linemen will read the nearest LB (or LBs) and the backs will take care of any LBs or DBs who try to blitz. They may also be assigned to help with a double team on a particularly tough pass rusher. There are other versions, too (like having an OL block a specified LB while a RB takes a DE), but classic BOB is the most common one used.
It's usually good, sound protection, but with modern zone blitzes and stuff a Man protection may struggle when a defender occupies an OL just by faking a pass rush, then drops off while someone else rushes through the hole behind that OL. A good example of this came in the Superbowl a few years ago when the Giants took advantage of the "Double Reads" that the Patriots' man protection schemes asked of the Centers and Guards by using zone blitzes. It wasn't that the Patriots' line couldn't block, it's that they were obeying their rules and getting suckered into trying to block the wrong guys.
Zone pass protection is sort of like a "Gap" version of pass pro: each offensive linemen will step into the gap on one side of him and block whatever comes through there. If no one attacks the gap, he'll keep an eye on the men next to him and combo with them, but he still must hold down his primary gap responsibility through the whole play. A simple type of Zone Pass Pro is the "Step In" protection that you'll see in a lot of 2 back offenses: the offensive linemen each step into their inside gap and block, while the RBs and TEs will take whatever comes around the outside through C/D gaps.
The problem with zone protections is that you might sometimes wind up with situations where the blocker with the outside gap gets isolated in a 2 on 1 situation with a blitz, and you have a greater risk of sometimes getting unfavorable match-ups where a RB has to block a DE or even a DT by himself.
In pass pro, you'll see a lot of hybrids of Man and Zone blocking. It's common to see a team zone one side, while they man the other with hinge blocking, etc.
Some links to great stuff on the passing game, courtesy of Amazon. As of this writing, all of these are currently available with free Super Saver Shipping.
The Bunch Attack: Using Compressed Formations in the Passing Game by Andrew Coverdale and Dan Robinson. This has become an offensive classic. More than just describing bunch formations, it's sort of a crash course in how to use an offensive system to really attack a defense. Basically, Coverdale and Robinson had written the best books on the passing game for many, many years.
Football's Quick Passing Game:was a great series by the same authors of "The Bunch Attack" that largely expanded upon the principles and basics laid out in the earlier book. The Quick Passing Game trilogy has rightfully been praised. Unfortunately, Amazon is only showing Vol. 3 as being in stock at the moment.
Concept Passing: Teaching the Modern Passing Game has, in my opinion, actually surpassed the great Coverdale and Robinson books that were the standard for years. Gonzalez, who has coached at the University of Texas as well as at several other high schools and colleges, really boils down the passing game to a simple level. In one concise volume, Gonzalez really demystifies and explains the passing game in ways that are useful and effective to any coach. This is a must-read.
The Complete Handbook of Coaching Wide Receivers: The Difference is in the Details by S. "Chuck" Meyers. If you or someone you know thinks that all there is to coaching wide receivers is yelling "catch the ball!" at them with increasing frustration, there is hope. No part of WR play goes uncovered, and unlike in some coaching books I've read, she provides great pictures that demonstrate her coaching points throughout. This is basically the best book (Slack's DVDs are still the best *resource*) on coaching a position that I've ever read.
Ed. Note: I am not in any way affiliated with Darin Slack and do not profit one dime from any traffic or purchases you make on his website. I am merely a football coach who is astounded by how good his products are and believe that everyone should learn the Gospel of Darin.
One of the first things I was interested in when I made the decision to become a coach was learning how to coach the passing game. Thus began an exhaustive search into materials, DVDs, etc. that has led me to some real gems.
I've noticed there are basically two kinds of teams in high school football: those who can throw the ball and those who can't. It's one thing to run the ball by choice and philosophy. It's quite another to do so out of fear and ignorance. Don't be the latter kind of coach.
After extensive research and a list of testimonials that stretches to Pluto and back, I was led to the work of Darin Slack, proprietor and head instructor of the Darin Slack Quarterback Academy.
Slack is quite simply the best QB coach you're ever going to find. He's revolutionized the way QBs are being taught and has worked with numerous pros and major Div. 1 QBs over the years, many of whom still seek out his services even after making "the big time." However, his Quarterback Academy really focuses on training middle and high school aged quarterbacks, as well as their coaches.
Now that the offseason is upon us, one of the best investments you can make in any young gunslinger's development is to enroll him in one of Slack's nationwide camps. Or if you're in Florida, contact him directly about some personal training.
For those who can't make it, or for coaches who want to become QB gurus in their own right, Slack also produces some of the finest coaching DVDs ever made in any sport--stuff that's as enlightening and thorough about QB play as it is "user friendly." His DVDs cover it all: professional grade mechanics, how to throw various routes, how to read coverages, decision making, offseason training for QBs, and even tips on how a coach can better in speeding up the reads and decision making for a QBs.
If you're the lifelong Offensive Line coach who's now as excited as he is terrified at the prospect of working with the QB, or the Head Coach who's tired of watching that talented kid overthrow the wide open receivers on 3rd and long, these DVDs are for you.
His C4 Self-Correct System is easily the best, most comprehensive guide to QB mechanics and fundamentals on the market. It has everything you'll ever need on the fundamentals of throwing the football.
Slack's R4 Accelerator System builds on C4 to create "an operating system for your passing game," designed to accelerate and clarify reads and decision making in the context of any offense.
His most recent product is the F4 system (I hate that he beat me to it, as I had my own ideas for a system to teach OL fundamentals called "F4"). F4 is a year-round workout system to specifically train and condition QBs in ways that translate practically to the field. Yes, it's great if your QB can outlift your entire offensive line or beat Usain Bolt in a sprint... but what good does it do him if he's stiff and immobile in the pocket?
Invest in them. They may look expensive at first, but they're worth more than every penny. You will see the Matrix. And so will your QB.